X
Personal; Worship

An Afternoon In Court

August 26, 2010 6

I spent some of Wednesday afternoon in a federal courtroom in uptown Charlotte.

(Sadly, a friend of mine was there for a sentencing hearing.)

The hearing was sparsely attended; in fact, aside from the court officials, I was the only one there.

Yet as I sat in that courtroom something about the surroundings seemed vaguely familiar . . .

  • A man up front wearing a robe seemed to be in charge.
  • He was perched behind an imposing wooden structure.
  • The room dimensions were long and narrow — the back row of the empty seats was considerable distance from the man in the robe behind the big wooden desk.
  • The ceiling was vaulted — I’d say 20 feet or more.
  • The lighting was neutral.
  • The man in the robe used phrases and terms that his cohorts understood but that I found incomprehensible.
  • The walls were covered with wood paneling.
  • Finally, I sat on a long wooden bench with no cushion.

As I took all this in, I realized where I’d seen this before. In church!

The attire of the leader, the size and shape of the room, the feel of the furniture, even the built-in intimidation of the proceedings — all of it felt exactly like dozens of church services I’ve been to through the years.

The guy in the robe is the preacher, the desk is the pulpit, the back-breaking seats are the pews, the design and scope of the room feels like most traditional church structures built between 1940 & 1980, and the incomprehensible language is what much of preaching and liturgy must sound like to uninitiated church-goers. The parallels were so precise it left me numb.

All of which led to a question I coudn’t answer: who copied whom?

There are 6 comments

  • Tom Walker says:

    I hope the hearing went well for your friend. You were there for a reason beyond your comparison of a church and a courtroom, and I suspect that your suppport was needed and appreciated.

  • Chris M says:

    The question may be “Who copied who?”

    The bottom line is, we don’t want to be like either one of them.

  • johnmeunier says:

    we don’t want to be like either one of them

    Why not?

    I’m not really arguing against your statement, but I’m curious why we feel that way.

    Obviously, for a very long time church thought this was the right way to do church. These were not stupid people or people who did not care about the spiritual life of the people on those hard wooden benches.

    I’m not saying it is bad to change. But can we articulate why we want to change?

    Rejecting old forms simply because they are old is no wiser than resisting new ones simply because they are new.

    Why do we do what we do is the question.

  • JMS says:

    Good enough to share on Facebook’s ‘Thinking Christians’ page…done!

  • dave says:

    i agree with JMS..
    i’ve linked it too…here.
    Click to read a related story about someone you may remember

  • Anonymous says:

    oops, link above was wrong.
    here it is.
    -dave

  • Leave a Reply to dave Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *