X

Talbot Davis

Uncategorized
Preaching For The Applause
December 19, 2012 at 2:00 am 2
While most Methodist churches refrain from all kinds of clapping -- either the rhythmic kind during a praise song or the appreciative kind during a sermon -- Good Shepherd has always been one of the exceptions.
 
We clap during most songs on most Sundays.  We even clapped during a version of "Angels We Have Heard On High" this past week.
 
And every so often, people applaud during sermons.  When it happens, it's heady, invigorating stuff.  Once during this past election season, people applauded when I asked, "who would have ever thought a chicken sandwich would be a political statement?"  Didn't see that one coming.
 
Yet preaching for the applause can be quite dangerous.  Why?  Because the quickest way to get a group of largely like-minded people to applaud is to set up a straw man opponent and then tear him down with your words.
 
So I suspect that in some church communities, the pastor could get applause if he preached against atheists or against communists or against adulterers or against Democrats or against Republicans.  Goodness, there are probably some who get applause for preaching against Methodists.  Or Baptists.  And I know that over the last decade people will clap for you if you preach against Islam. Nothing rallies people together better than a common enemy.
 
Which is why I try with varying degrees of success to preach for things as opposed to against them.  It's why I hope to preach for . . .
 
*The uniqueness of Christ;
*The authority of Scripture;
*The fact that staying faithful is the best way to 'bring sexy back';
*The joy of salvation;
*The reality that what unites us is cross & not candidate, resurrection and not race, crucifixion and not candidate;
*The power God implants in each of us to deliver us from self-destruction.
 
I hope to preach for truth and for grace and for love rather than for the applause.
 
 
 
 
CONTINUE READING ...
Uncategorized
Top Five Tuesday — Top Five Christmas Hymns
December 18, 2012 at 2:00 am 2
Well, it is just around the corner, you know.

So here are my five favorite Christmas songs from the sacred genre.  Which cuts out offerings by Burl Ives, Bruce Springsteen, and John Lennon.

5.  God Rest You Merry Gentlemen.  I don't really like this one all that much, but while in seminary I took voice lessons. For my final "exam," I had to sing this one as a solo.  In front of people.  Just me.  Never. Again

4.  Angels We Have Heard On High.  Though I will never take sides in the Great Christmas Debate:  is it prounounced in excelsis or in exshelsis

3.  O Come All Ye Faithful.  Has to be the first Christmas song the church sings in December

2.  Hark The Herald Angels Sing.  Because it's written by a Wesley?  Probably.

1.  O Holy Night.  It wouldn't be Christmas Eve without some of my favorite people launching into this one.
CONTINUE READING ...
Uncategorized
Preaching In Tongues
December 17, 2012 at 2:00 am 2
Yesterday our student ministries pastor, John Pavlovitz, delivered the sermon at the 8:30, 10, and 11:30 services.

Why?  Well, he's a really good preacher.

But there was another reason:  because I spent the 11:30 hour in our Corner Campus preaching a sermon to our new Latino worship community.

And the sermon was all in Spanish.  Not with a translator, but out of my mouth.

I studied the language a bit in both high school and college, have taken every opportunity to practice it as an adult, but have dramatically increased my ability in the last eight years as we have welcomed more and more Spanish speaking people into Good Shepherd.

So Sammy Gonzalez and I have been planning this for several months, recognizing that the new worship family would benefit from knowing that the church's pastor not only loves them but is doing his best to communicate with them in their heart language.

The message covered a critical part of our mission statement -- living relationship with Jesus Christ -- as we believe it to be vital that whatever language you speak, you know the big WHAT of Good Shepherd.

The sermon itself?  Well, it was easier to deliver than it was to prepare.  And I'm blessed that our Spanish friends are quite patient with the ways I can confuse my verb tenses (by the way, don't make fun of the way an international might get English wrong until you've tried something like this).  And it was the first time in 23+ years that I've actually taken a manuscript up to the preaching place.

Yet I believe the people got something out of it, and in fact realized before they try to live FOR Jesus they will want to spend much time WITH Jesus.

Since much of the message centered on Revelation 3:20 (or, as they say it in Spanish, Apocalipsis 3:20) -- I will eat with him and he with me -- we finished with communion.

Because that's one of those celebrations that transcends language.

Here's the content of what I preached yesterday.  Good luck!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 


La iglesia Good Shepherd esta invitando a toda persona a una relación viva con Jesucristo. 
            Piensa, por favor, por un momento que la iglesia NO dice.
            No decimos que es invitando a todo persona a una religión muerta.
            No decimos que es invitando a todo persona a un ritual frio.
            No decimos que es invitando a toda persona a un conocimiento secreto sobre Jesucristo. 
            No.  Nunca.
            La iglesia es invitando a toda persona a una relación viva con Jesucristo.  Me gusta mucho las palabras.  Por qué?  Porque son verdaderas.  Una relación viva con Jesucristo.
            Pero: que es una relación viva?  Es una buen pregunta!  Mucha veces, las cosas que hacemos interfieren con un relación viva.  La iglesia, la religión, el ritual . . . toda nos parecen que el Dios es solamente palabras en un papel o un digno que viven muy distante de nosotros.  La religión hace el dios distante!  Ay caramba!
            Hay algunas personas aquí que trata y trata y trata por dios.  Más atender la iglesia, mas leen los libros, mas escuchando a los sermones, mas confiesan al ministerios.  Más, más, más.  Pero no sienten el amor de dios y no tienen un relación viva.  Porque Jesucristo no quiere más actividades.  Que quiere?
            En Apocalipsis 3:20, Jesucristo dice:  “He aquí, yo estoy a la puerta y llamo:  si alguno oyere mi voz y abriere la puerta, entrare a el y cenare con el y el conmigo.”
            Escúchame:  las palabras aquí están por los personas cristianos.  Muchas veces usan el verso para personas que no creen in cristo y los decimos, “Jesucristo llámame!  Es a la puerta de tu corazón y llámame!  Lo abierta y lo recibes.”  No.  No es lo que ese verse ensena.  Jesucristo llama a la puerta de la iglesia and nos dice:  “Abriere la puerta! Cuando lo hacen, entrare y . . . Que bueno!
            Pero cuando oímos Jesucristo decir “entrare y . . .” pensamos que los próximas palabras van a estar:  “voy a hacerles trabajar mucho!” o “voy a WHIP YOU INTO SHAPE” o “voy a cambiar su vida” o – esperamos – “voy a ganarte mucho dinero!”  Pero, las palabras próximas son muy diferente de lo que pensamos.  Mira:  cenarecon el, ye el conmigo.”  Comer.  Comiendo la comida.  Jesucristo simplemente quiere para ser contigo y conmigo.  No es un relación hacienda; es una relación viva.  Jesucristo quiere para ser contigo porque Jesucristo esta loco para ti.  Escuche:  READ Lucado quote that finishes with: he’s crazy about you.
            En los días de Jesucristo en el mundo, para comer con una persona le da lo mejor honorario y digno.  Ellos pasan mucho tiempo durante comidas.  Tiempo para hablar, tiempo para descansar, tiempo para ser.  Es lo que Jesucristo quiere contigo y con nosotros.
            Por favor:  no trate de vivir con Jesucristo sin pasar mucho tiempo con Jesucristo.  REFRAIN.  Venga a la vida porque Jesucristo quiere que venga a comer.
            Cuando nací mi hija Taylor (hoy ella tiene 23 anos!), la trajimos a nuestra casa del hospital.  Y recuerdo un día que la aguante cuando LYING DOWN ON COUCH (descansaba en el sofá).  Y solo quería aguantarla, y amarla, y oler su cabeza.  Por ser mi hija.  Por favor, da a dios el plesor di simplimiento para ser contigo.  Para ser y para comer. 
            Como?  Un buen pregunta!  En esta próxima semana lo hace por favor:
1)      Ora muchas veces durante el día.  No necesitan orar por dos horas a un tiempo!  Muchas veces nos sentimos culpable porque no oramos ENOUGH (suficiente).  No!  Es más fiel para orar durante el día – como un text messages por su esposa.  No un mensaje un día, pero muchos mensajes durante el día!  Es lo mismo con el Dios.  Él quiere oír de sus niños!
2)      Para mi . . . oro en las lenguas.  Es bíblico y creo que algunas personas aquí oran en la misma manera.  Cuando Dios habla a mi, puedo escuchar mucho mejor su voz.  Mi fiel venga a la vida. No conozco la lengua – es posiblemente que es una lengua de los ángeles.  Y creo que hay locales en el mundo donde personas oran en lenguas – y la lengua es ingles!  O español!
3)      Relación viva ocurre en los grupos.  Cosas vivas no viven solo!  Viven juntos!  Cuando veo Sammy hablar o Becky o a Chris cantar y cuando oigo a Luis, mi relación con Jesucristo es mas fuerte.  So: en la próxima semana, llama una persona aquí en el teléfono y escucha para el fiel que ese persona tiene.  Su relación con Jesucristo va a venga a la vida.
4)      Recuerda Apocalipsis 3:20: “He aquí, yo estoy a la puerta y llamo:  si alguno oyere mi voz y abriere la puerta, entrare a el y cenare con el y el conmigo.”  Solamente quiere para ser.  Para comer.  Para pasar el tiempo.
Cuando era un niño – hace dos años – mi Hermana ser caso con un esposo de México, él se llama Fernando Labastida.  Mi Hermana se llama Nancy Labastida.  También, cuando tuve nueve años, mi hermano se caso con una madre de Perú.  Pues . . . durante una reunión de familia cuando tuve diez años, la familia cocinaban arroz con pollo.  Y me enseñaron a decir “la comida esta BUENISIMA!”  Hace 40 años y lo recuerdo!  La comida esta BUENISIMA!
            Y la comida del Jesucristo es buenísima también.  Solamente quiere estar contigo y comer contigo.  No necesita ganar su alma; la tienes ya.   





CONTINUE READING ...
Uncategorized
Good Shepherd In The News
December 14, 2012 at 2:00 am 1
This week's Lake Wylie Pilot ran a nice feature on Good Shepherd.  You can read it here and find out what happened, what's happening, and what's fixin' to happen.
CONTINUE READING ...
Uncategorized
What Happened Between Romans 11 And Romans 12?
December 13, 2012 at 7:35 am 0
Yesterday I posted on a new understanding I've gained on Paul's much debated conclusion in Romans 11:26 that "all Israel will be saved." 

And those words are really but a prelude to the doxology of Romans 11:33-36:

33 Oh, the depth of the riches of the wisdom and[a] knowledge of God!
    How unsearchable his judgments,
    and his paths beyond tracing out!
34 “Who has known the mind of the Lord?
    Or who has been his counselor?”[b]
35 “Who has ever given to God,
    that God should repay him?”[c]
36 For from him and through him and to him are all things.
    To him be the glory forever! Amen.


It's almost as if Paul is saying, "these issues are deeply personal to me, I've raised some issues that I may not even be able to answer, so let's all stand and praise the Lord because he's the one who is in charge of how it all pans out anyway!" 

I love the Romans doxololgy, as any conversation about doctrine should inexorably move to worship.

And then, as even casual students of Romans know, the letter changes tone completely.  "Therefore," Paul says in 12:1, "I urge you, brothers, in view of God's mercy to offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God -- this is your spiritual act of worship." 

What flows from there is four chapters worth of admonitions on Christian living, including such echoes of Jesus as "Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse" (12:14) and "Accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters." 

So the beauty of the doxology followed by the abruptness of the transition makes me wonder exactly how the early church used this part of Romans.  Remember: the first churches did not have multiple copies of Scripture that individuals could read.  Instead, there was likely a single scroll containing a community-owned copy of the the letter.  Church leaders then read the document out loud -- and some scholars have suggested that different readers played different "parts" in the dialog, particularly in asking and answering the rhetorical questions that frame the book  (3:1, 3:9, 4:1, 6:1, and 6:15 for example).

Anyway, the end of chapter 11 sounds very much like the conclusion of one worship service.  God is great, his answers are beyond our deepest imagining, so let's all rise to your feet as you're able and we'll sing "How Great Thou Art" together.  OK, "How Great" didn't appear until 1953, but you get the point.

Then the church caught its breath, broke for a covered dish supper, fell asleep while watching a Panthers game, and returned later for a Sunday evening teaching service.  What our Baptist friends used to call BTU -- Baptist Training Union!  That separate gathering then dug into the practicalities of Romans 12-16.

Or maybe the doxology of 11:33-36 finished worship for one Sunday and the church rested an entire week -- you might have to after wrestling with the heaviness of Romans -- and chapter 12 was where they started the next Sunday.

This is all conjecture, of course.  But the pondering helps me visualize the different ways the first Christians might have used the decidedly different sections of the incomparable book of Romans.

To him be glory forever indeed.  Amen.
 
CONTINUE READING ...